Hope for More Transparency on Drone Strikes, But the Law is Still Secret – May 28, 2013 Newsletter

In This Issue:
News from Coalition Partners & Others
I. Tell Your Senator to Protect FOIA in the Farm Bill
II. Hope for More Transparency on Drone Strikes, But the Law is Still Secret

News from Coalition Partners & Others


EFF Fights Secret Wiretaps in a Secret Court

The Electronic Frontier Foundation filed a motion in the secretive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) last week. To challenge the secrecy of the FISC opinions, EFF had to navigate what they describe as a “Catch-22 environment.” While the Department of Justice argued that the FISC procedural rules barred the release of FISC opinions under the Freedom of Information Act, the FISC itself had pointed to the FOIA as the only avenue for accessing the opinions. Learn more about EFF’s challenge here.


Heins Wins Hugh Hefner First Amendment Award

Marjorie Heins, Founding Director of Free Expression Policy Project, was presented with the Hugh Hefner First Amendment Award for Book Publishing on May 22nd for her book, "Priests of Our Democracy: The Supreme Court, Academic Freedom, and the Anti-Communist Purge."

I. Tell Your Senator to Protect FOIA in the Farm Bill

Pressure from the open government community kept amendments to the Farm Bill that would have undermined the public’s right to know information about corporate farms from reaching the floor last week. However, amendments may resurface when Congress returns from recess in June. Use the Project on Government Oversight’s Action Alert to oppose amendments in the Farm Bill that would undermine FOIA.

II. Hope for More Transparency on Drone Strikes, But the Law is Still Secret

In a speech at the National Defense University on Thursday, May 23rd, President Obama discussed Congressional oversight of targeted killing with drones and the declassification of the deaths of four U.S. citizens killed by drone strikes abroad, including Anwar Awlaki. The speech broadly outlined the administration’s path forward on national security and its consideration of civil liberties, but made no concrete steps to shedding light on an increasingly opaque national security universe or the interpretations of the law that guide it.

While President Obama outlined the justification for the use of drone strikes, the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) memos interpreting the law for targeted killing were not mentioned in the speech. The public deserves to have a clear understanding of the interpretation of the nation’s laws, especially when the result of those interpretations was the death of an American citizen. The Obama administration did, however announce new “Presidential Policy guidelines” to be used by the administration to authorize the use of strikes. The Associated Press references an unclassified summary of these policies —- this document should be made accessible to the public.

There are some questions about whether moving the drone program to the Pentagon will increase the drone program’s accountability to the public or lead to more secrecy in the program. Regardless of which agency controls the program, it is clear that the administration must be more transparent about the legal foundations, processes, and consequences of its actions conducted in the public’s name.

Categories: Uncategorized