On Wednesday April 10, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence amended the controversial Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA), HR 624, and passed the bill out of the Committee.
Both civil society and the government have released reports on what was accomplished through the National Action Plan issued in September 2011. Both reports share one critically important finding: for nearly all the commitments, there remains work to be done and further lessons to be learned. Open government, you could say, is not built in a single year.
OpenTheGovernment.org is taking deep dives into civil society’s evaluation of the implementation of the US National Action Plan, and taking a look at the lessons learned from the government’s self-assessment. During the evaluation process, a few teams grappled with addressing commitments that were vague, long-finished, or unevenly and incompletely implemented across agencies.
In February our Executive Director took to the pages of The Hill to challenge President Obama to recommit to creating an "unprecedented level of openness in Government" during his second term. She outlined a 100-day agenda to put the US on the path to accomplishing this goal. With more than half of the 100 days gone, we thought it would be an appropriate time to look at what the government has made progress on, and what issues remain to be tackled.
On April 3rd, more than 40 organizations, including OpenTheGovernment.org and several of our partners and allies, joined in sending a letter to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence to urge them to make the mark up of the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA), planned for the week of April 8 open to the public.
In a recently released evaluation of the Administration's efforts to implement the Nation Action Plan, we note that the government's efforts could more correctly be labeled as "first steps" rather than the needed "leaps forward." We hope to give you a better sense of why we came to this conclusion by taking a deeper dive into the evaluation of the government's efforts for a few of these commitments. Now up: Open Government Plans.
Our friends at Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) won a major victory today in their ongoing case against the Federal Elections Commission (FEC) that will help maintain what the ruling refers to as the "comprehensive scheme" in the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) that "encourages prompt request-processing and agency accountability.&qu
As many of our readers know, we think that the FOIAonline requester and management system has great potential. This fall we decided to test those expectations by launching a project comparing the requester experience of FOIAonline and the disparate systems of the 14 agencies that receive the highest number of requests each year.
Recent news that one of the two CIA employees who authorized the destruction of tapes showing the torture of CIA detainees – despite a court order to preserve them – has been placed in charge of the CIA’s clandestine service is yet another slap in the face for the rule of law and government accountability.
The September 20, 2011 National Action Plan (Plan) included 26 concrete commitments to make progress toward 17 larger goals that reflect the spirit of the Open Government Partnership, and much of our community’s broader vision. Our recently-released evaluation of the Administration's efforts to implement the Plan found that the government met the letter of most of its commitments, but the government's efforts could more correctly be labeled as "first steps" rather than the needed "leaps forward." We hope to give you a better sense of why we came to this conclusion by taking a deeper dive into the evaluation of the government's efforts for a few of these commitments. First up: Professionalize FOIA.
CREW promotes ethics and accountability in government and public life by targeting government officials -- regardless of party affiliation -- who sacrifice the common good to special interests.